MikeK
11-19-2006, 09:16 PM
Safety first
Psoriasis sufferer loses paramedic job afters disease is adjudged a hazard
By Stephen Gordon
19 November 2006
A man who suffers from the skin disease psoriasis has failed in a legal battle to show the NI Ambulance Service acted unfairly when it refused him a job.
The psoriasis sufferer lost his chance to become an emergency ambulance worker following warnings from a doctor at the Royal Victoria Hospital that his skin condition would pose a hazard to himself and patients.
The doctor warned his severe psoriasis could lead to the spread of MRSA and put the man at possible risk of blood infections including HIV.
The Court of Appeal in Belfast last week rejected a claim by the man that Ambulance chiefs had breached the Disability Discrimination Act in refusing him a job.
Lord Chief Justice Sir Brian Kerr dismissed claims he had been refused a post because of a facial disfigurement that resulted from psoriasis.
Sir Brian upheld an earlier ruling by an industrial tribunal in favour of the Ambulance Service.
Psoriasis is a skin ailment affecting two to three per cent of the population and it appears as raised red patches of skin covered with silvery scales.
The Court of Appeal was told that in 2001 the claimant successfully applied for the post of emergency ambulance person.
But in February 2002 he attended a pre-employment medical with Dr Martin Tohill at the RVH.
Dr Tohill found he was unfit for the post because he suffered from such severe psoriasis.
The doctor said exposure to allergens or irritants - including latex - in the course of employment could aggravate the man's condition.
He also gave an MRSA warning, saying: "There would be a cross-infection hazard for patients (especially of wounds) due to the colonisation of abnormal skin, which sheds more skin cells, by bacteria."
Dr Tohill also highlighted dangers to the job applicant of blood-borne infections like hepatitis A and B or HIV, saying there would be a substantially increased risk of infection by the penetration of microbiological agents through broken skin.
Dismissing the man's appeal, Sir Brian said: "It is clear that the differential treatment of the appellant did not arise as a result of his disfigurement.
"He was not employed because it was judged that he was at risk of infection and that his condition carried the danger that he would infect others.
"These considerations have nothing to with his being disfigured."
Back | Return to top | Printable StorySource: http://www.sundaylife.co.uk/news/story.jsp?story=715008.
Psoriasis sufferer loses paramedic job afters disease is adjudged a hazard
By Stephen Gordon
19 November 2006
A man who suffers from the skin disease psoriasis has failed in a legal battle to show the NI Ambulance Service acted unfairly when it refused him a job.
The psoriasis sufferer lost his chance to become an emergency ambulance worker following warnings from a doctor at the Royal Victoria Hospital that his skin condition would pose a hazard to himself and patients.
The doctor warned his severe psoriasis could lead to the spread of MRSA and put the man at possible risk of blood infections including HIV.
The Court of Appeal in Belfast last week rejected a claim by the man that Ambulance chiefs had breached the Disability Discrimination Act in refusing him a job.
Lord Chief Justice Sir Brian Kerr dismissed claims he had been refused a post because of a facial disfigurement that resulted from psoriasis.
Sir Brian upheld an earlier ruling by an industrial tribunal in favour of the Ambulance Service.
Psoriasis is a skin ailment affecting two to three per cent of the population and it appears as raised red patches of skin covered with silvery scales.
The Court of Appeal was told that in 2001 the claimant successfully applied for the post of emergency ambulance person.
But in February 2002 he attended a pre-employment medical with Dr Martin Tohill at the RVH.
Dr Tohill found he was unfit for the post because he suffered from such severe psoriasis.
The doctor said exposure to allergens or irritants - including latex - in the course of employment could aggravate the man's condition.
He also gave an MRSA warning, saying: "There would be a cross-infection hazard for patients (especially of wounds) due to the colonisation of abnormal skin, which sheds more skin cells, by bacteria."
Dr Tohill also highlighted dangers to the job applicant of blood-borne infections like hepatitis A and B or HIV, saying there would be a substantially increased risk of infection by the penetration of microbiological agents through broken skin.
Dismissing the man's appeal, Sir Brian said: "It is clear that the differential treatment of the appellant did not arise as a result of his disfigurement.
"He was not employed because it was judged that he was at risk of infection and that his condition carried the danger that he would infect others.
"These considerations have nothing to with his being disfigured."
Back | Return to top | Printable StorySource: http://www.sundaylife.co.uk/news/story.jsp?story=715008.